Table 1. RANKL levels with different types of fungi in CD patients.
|
Fungus types |
Count of patients |
RANKL levels |
|
Candida albicans |
1 |
0 |
|
Candida tropicalis |
1 |
0 |
|
Candida glabrata |
2 |
0.07 |
|
Pencillium |
1 |
0 |
|
Candida tropicalls, Asprgillus |
1 |
0 |
|
Candida albicans, Asprgillus, Fussarium |
4 |
1.364 |
|
Candida albicans, Asprgillus, Pencillium |
3 |
5.817 |
|
Candida glabrata, Pencillium, Mucor |
4 |
3.61 |
|
Candida glabrata, Aspirgillus |
6 |
2.586 |
|
Candida glabrata, Mucor, Rhizopus |
4 |
2.568 |
|
Candida albicans, Asprgillus |
5 |
4.497 |
|
Candida albicans, Pencillium, Saccharomyces |
4 |
8.141 |
|
Candida glabrata, Asprgillus, Cryptococcus |
4 |
7.317 |
|
Aspirgillus, Trichophyton |
2 |
0.736 |
|
Candida gulliermondi, Mucor |
5 |
9.952 |
|
Candida glabrata, Pencillium |
4 |
3.946 |
|
Mucor, Saccharomyces |
4 |
5.196 |
|
Saccharomyces |
5 |
10.371 |
|
Mean±S.E. |
|
6.83±0.35 |
|
T test |
|
19.63 |
|
P-value |
|
0.001* |
The data represented serum RANKL levels in different fungal species compared to one another in CD patients. Significant at probability level p≤0.001