Table 3. Effect of Cantharellus cibarius extracts on microbial activity.
Bacterial strains |
Zone of inhibition (mm) |
|||||
Hexane |
Chloroform |
Ethanol |
Methanol |
Hot water |
STM |
|
B. subtilis |
- |
8.3 ±1.72 |
20.3±1.72 |
- |
- |
25.8±1.16 |
S. aureus |
- |
- |
29.6 ±1.72 |
- |
- |
26.6±0.68 |
E. coli |
9.33 ±1.72 |
- |
29 ±2.26 |
- |
- |
26.2±0.50 |
K. pneumoniae |
- |
- |
29.6±1.45 |
- |
- |
27.5±1.13 |
P. aeruginosa |
8 ±0.57 |
10.16 ±0.86 |
- |
- |
- |
26.2±0.54 |
A. baumannii |
- |
- |
|
19 ±0.57 |
- |
28.9 ±0.70 |
P. fluorescens |
- |
9.33 ±0.65 |
9.66±0.65 |
|
- |
15.9±0.70 |
E. aerogenes |
- |
- |
- |
11.6 ±1.72 |
- |
20.1±1.42 |
P.mirabilis |
- |
20.3±0.88 |
- |
- |
- |
22.6±1.96 |
*Results are expressed as mean+ standard error. (-) = No zone of inhibition. All study was carried out in a triplicate manner
*STM: Streptomycin zone of inhibition as contro