JABET Explore more articles

Table 3. Effects on intestinal microbial populations (log10 CFU/gm of intestinal content) of control, probiotics and AGP groups (Mean ± SEM) in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).

Parameters

 

 

Group (Mean ± SEM)

F-value

Polynomial Contrast

Control

Probiotics

0.015gm/Bird

Probiotics

0.03gm/Bird

Probiotics

0.045gm/Bird

AGP

 

Linear

Quadric

E. coli

6.400a±0.093

6.232a±0.160

5.160b±0.224

5.870a±0.263

5.149b±0.198

8.93**

0.007

0.036

Salmonella spp

5.569a±0.043

5.457a±0.138

4.440b±0.154

5.395a±0.066

4.330b±0.223

18.30**

0.005

0.001

Staphylococcus spp

3.872a±0.215

3.557ab±0.065

2.923c±0.209

3.375b±0.057

2.810c±0.122

8.69**

0.006

0.023

TBC

8.365a±0.222

7.949ab±0.199

6.972c±0.237

7.490b±0.227

6.512c±0.147

12.61**

0.002

0.048

 

Significant differences were determined using One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range tests. The orthogonal polynomial contrast test was considered to ascertain the linear and quadratic effects of increasing probiotics supplementation (gm) in diets on each parameter. Differences compared to control and treated groups are ** Significant at 1% (p<0.01); Figures in the row with similar alphabet (a,b,c) do not differ significantly. CFU= Colony forming units, NS= non-significant, gm= Gram, kg= Kilogram, cm= Centimetre.